Which sample types have been validated using SeekSpace?

2026-06-23

Answer:
SeekSpace assays have been tested across a broad range of tissue types and species.

Validation status definitions:

  •  Validated: Consistently reliable performance under standard workflow conditions
  • ⚠️ Caution / Conditional: Performance may be strongly influenced by tissue characteristics, sectioning difficulty, RNA stability, or nuclei recovery
  •  Not Recommended: Current workflow compatibility is limited due to low nuclei recovery, severe degradation, high debris levels, or poor transcriptomic performance

Observed performance reflects typical project experience and may vary depending on sample quality, handling, embedding conditions, and tissue pathology.

Representative validated sample types

Validated tissues include humanmouseratmonkeypigfish, and avian samples.

Representative validated tissues include:

Species

Validated Tissue

Human

Liver Cancer

Human

Breast Cancer

Human

Brain Glioma / Brain Tumor

Human

Testis

Human

Eye

Human

Kidney / Kidney Cancer

Human

Prostate Cancer

Human

Liver

Human

Lung / Lung Cancer

Human

Uterine Tumor

Human

Stomach / Gastric Cancer

Human

Embryo

Human

Brain

Human

Oral Cancer

Human

Pancreatic Cancer

Human

Cholangiocarcinoma

Human

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Brain Metastasis

Human

Skin Skin Tumor

Human

Lymph Node

Human

Head and Neck Cancer

Human

Hypopharyngeal Cancer

Human

Thyroid Cancer

Human

Adrenal Nodules

Human

Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma

Human

Dental Follicle

Human

Melanoma

Human

Cervical Cancer

Human

Spinal Tumor

Human

Lower Limb Tissue

Human

Spleen

Human

Intestinal Cancer

Human

Bladder Cancer

Human

Adenoid

Human

Endometrium with Myometrium

Human

Decidua

Human

Placenta

Human

Adenoma

Mouse

Brain

Mouse

Brain Tumor

Mouse

Testis

Mouse

Subcutaneous Tumor

Mouse

Ovary

Mouse

Tongue Cancer

Mouse

Kidney Capsule Tumor Model

Mouse

CKD Kidney

Mouse

Pancreatic Cancer

Mouse

Kidney

Mouse

Thymus

Mouse

Eye

Mouse

Pancreatic Tumor

Mouse

Patella

Mouse

Hippocampus

Mouse

Penile Corpus Cavernosum

Mouse

Embryo Shoulder

Mouse

B16F10 Melanoma

Mouse

Lung

Mouse

Bladder

Mouse

Gastric Ulcer

Mouse

Spleen

Rat

Fetal Jaw Bone

Rat

Brain

Rat

Fetal Tooth Germ

Rat

Gastric Ulcer

Rat

Embryo

Rat

Ovary

Monkey

Testis

Monkey

Brain

Carp

Gonad

Pig

Ovary

Pig

Kidney

Bird

Brain

Caution / conditional sample types

The following sample types may be feasible but are considered high-risk or may require workflow optimization.

Tissue Type

Main Challenge

Explanation

Recommended Handling

Adult zebrafish

Difficult sectioning

Sections may contain gaps or fail to remain intact

High risk. Isopentane + liquid nitrogen embedding strongly recommended. Pre-screen samples before submission.

Placenta, aquatic, and marine samples

High water content

Ice crystal formation may damage tissue structure and reduce nuclei and gene capture efficiency

High risk. Use isopentane + liquid nitrogen embedding and minimize freeze-thaw cycles.

Grouper gonad

Large cell diameter

Gonadal cells may exceed 20 μm and frequently rupture during sectioning, leading to very low cell capture

High risk. Increased section thickness may be considered for large-cell studies.

Certain human or mouse glioma samples, snake venom gland, embryonic brain

Tissue detachment risk

Soft and fragile tissues with high water content are prone to floating or detachment during processing

High risk. Optimize embedding and handling conditions.

Low-fat tissues where adipose tissue is not the focus (e.g., lymph node, breast cancer, prostate, skin)

Difficult sectioning

Tissue may tear easily, detach after sectioning, exhibit low nuclei counts after H&E staining, or show reduced median gene counts

High risk. Some datasets may require force-processing during downstream analysis.

Placental villi, placenta, decidua

RNA instability

RNA degradation may continue during processing, often resulting in low nuclei recovery and reduced median gene counts

High risk. Rapid freezing and minimal handling are critical.

Tendon and Achilles tendon

High debris content

Elongated nuclei and highly fibrous tissue structure may lead to debris accumulation, partial capture area loss, and severe clogging risk

High risk. Careful preprocessing is required.

Uterine fibroid, gastric ulcer, skin tumor, kidney cancer

Low cell capture efficiency

Fibrous architecture and spindle-shaped nuclei may reduce nuclei recovery in certain regions

High risk. Lower cell capture efficiency should be anticipated.

Necrotic, fibrotic, calcified, or mechanically tough tissues

Low nuclei recovery

Tissue fragmentation, RNA degradation, low nuclei yield, and excessive debris are common

High risk. Lower capture efficiency is expected.

Biopsy punch samples

Small tissue area

Limited tissue area may reduce nuclei capture efficiency

High risk. Samples with punch diameter >1.2 mm may benefit from thicker sections (~30 μm) or multi-tissue embedding.

Mouse liver and liver cancer

Low gene counts

Ribosomal blocking may be less effective, increasing the risk of low median gene counts

High risk. Lower transcript complexity should be anticipated.

Neonatal mouse patella

Tissue floating risk

Soft bone tissue may section successfully but frequently detaches during processing

High risk. Handle sections carefully during mounting.

 Not Recommended Sample Types

The following sample types are currently not recommended due to substantial technical limitations.

Tissue Type

Main Limitation

Explanation

Hair follicle, zebrafish heart, organoids, dorsal root ganglion (DRG)

Small tissue area

Small section size (<3 × 3 mm or thickness <500 μm) results in insufficient nuclei recovery. If attempted, multiple tissues should be embedded together on the same plane.

Tympanic membrane, trabecular meshwork, retina, yolk sac membrane, and other membrane-like tissues (<30 μm)

Extremely thin tissue

Tissue quantity is insufficient for both QC and downstream gene expression analysis.

Bone and rotator cuff

Difficult sectioning

Bone tissue is difficult to section, prone to detachment, and contains excessive debris. Rotator cuff samples often contain bone and exhibit very low nuclei recovery with high clogging risk.

Adipose tissue or highly fat-rich tissue where adipose biology is the main focus

Difficult sectioning and poor nuclei recovery

Tissue is difficult to section, prone to detachment, exhibits low nuclei counts after H&E staining, and often yields extremely poor cell capture after gene expression analysis.

Plant samples

Difficult nuclei isolation

Nuclei extraction differs substantially from standard animal tissue workflows and is currently not optimized.

Vessel, plaque, synovium, muscle, optic nerve, heart, and spinal cord

Excessive debris and extremely low nuclei abundance

Samples are difficult to section, contain extensive debris, and often show severe RNA degradation and poor gene detection performance. High clogging risk is common.

Pancreas

Severe RNA degradation

RNA degradation frequently continues throughout sectioning and enzymatic processing. Samples are generally not recommended for submission.

Bone marrow

Extremely low gene detection

Median gene counts are typically extremely low after spatial processing.

Intestine

Severe degradation risk

Digestive enzyme activity often causes rapid degradation during nuclei isolation and processing.

Snake lung and gonad

Poor platform compatibility

Based on project experience, nuclei capture efficiency is extremely low.

Mouse lung (asthma or fungal infection models)

Low median gene counts

Ribosomal blocking is often insufficient, resulting in low transcript complexity and poor median gene counts.

文件: